<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for EU Case Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eucaselaw.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eucaselaw.info</link>
	<description>a blog about leading judgments of the ECJ, CFI, CST and ECtHR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:46:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Schmidberger [2003] by damir</title>
		<link>http://www.eucaselaw.info/schmidberger-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-20063</link>
		<dc:creator>damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eucaselaw.info/2007/06/05/schmidberger-2003/#comment-20063</guid>
		<description>I still dont understand, does this mean that member states can use fundamental human rights to justify derogations on FMG?
Even though most literature says that quantitative restrictions on FMG can be saved only by reference to derogations from paragraph 30 EC?
Thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still dont understand, does this mean that member states can use fundamental human rights to justify derogations on FMG?<br />
Even though most literature says that quantitative restrictions on FMG can be saved only by reference to derogations from paragraph 30 EC?<br />
Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zhu and Chen [2004] by maria</title>
		<link>http://www.eucaselaw.info/zhu-and-chen-2004/comment-page-1/#comment-19364</link>
		<dc:creator>maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eucaselaw.ideoblogs.com/?p=19#comment-19364</guid>
		<description>what was the reason for refuse actually?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what was the reason for refuse actually?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Schmidberger [2003] by QuickLaw &#187; Blog Archive &#187; One Schmidberger with Omega Dressing Please</title>
		<link>http://www.eucaselaw.info/schmidberger-2003/comment-page-1/#comment-13565</link>
		<dc:creator>QuickLaw &#187; Blog Archive &#187; One Schmidberger with Omega Dressing Please</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eucaselaw.info/2007/06/05/schmidberger-2003/#comment-13565</guid>
		<description>[...] free movement of goods. So said the ECJ some time ago in the Schmidberger case. As the short lived EU Case Law digest pointed out, it is &#8220;probably&#8221; the first time that the ECJ found a source of law that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] free movement of goods. So said the ECJ some time ago in the Schmidberger case. As the short lived EU Case Law digest pointed out, it is &#8220;probably&#8221; the first time that the ECJ found a source of law that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oteiza Olazabal [2002] by ^sekouri salah eddin</title>
		<link>http://www.eucaselaw.info/oteiza-olazabal-2002/comment-page-1/#comment-7784</link>
		<dc:creator>^sekouri salah eddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eucaselaw.info/oteiza-olazabal-2002/#comment-7784</guid>
		<description>ich bin hairaten mit frau aus polan und ich habe aufanteltserlaubnis aber kaine arbeits arleubnis danke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ich bin hairaten mit frau aus polan und ich habe aufanteltserlaubnis aber kaine arbeits arleubnis danke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oteiza Olazabal [2002] by ^sekouri salah eddin</title>
		<link>http://www.eucaselaw.info/oteiza-olazabal-2002/comment-page-1/#comment-7783</link>
		<dc:creator>^sekouri salah eddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eucaselaw.info/oteiza-olazabal-2002/#comment-7783</guid>
		<description>ich bin hairetan mit frau aus polan und ich habe aufanteltserlaubnis eu aber ich habe kaine arbeitserlaubnis was kanen machen dagiegan tun danke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ich bin hairetan mit frau aus polan und ich habe aufanteltserlaubnis eu aber ich habe kaine arbeitserlaubnis was kanen machen dagiegan tun danke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
